Talkinmince Article Directory - Free Article Submission.
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Number Times Read : 21    Word Count: 632  
Categories

Acne
Adult
Arts & Entertainment
Business
Celebrities
Communications
Computers
Disease & Illness
Fashion
Finance
Food & Beverage
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Business
Politics
Product Reviews
Recreation & Sports
Reference & Education
Self Improvement
Society
Travel & Leisure
Vehicles
Writing & Speaking
 
Stats
Total Articles: 169563
Total Authors: 23585
Total Downloads: 11363057


Newest Member
dakog tiekalzz

 


   

Three Design Features in Teaching Grammar as a Liberating Force



[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.talkinmince.com/rss.php?rss=104
By : li bing    19 or more times read
Submitted 2010-09-07 05:48:24
From the foregoing discussion, I propose that an approach to teaching grammar as a liberating force should include the following three elements:

1. Learner choice
Given that the deployment of grammar in communication invariably involves the speaker or writer in making a free and conscious choice (notwithstanding the fact that having chosen a particular grammatical structure there are conventions to observe regarding its acceptable formation), the first element is that the learner must have a degree of choice over the grammatical structures they use, and deploy them as effectively as they can to match specific contexts and meet specific communicative goals. In this respect, an emphasis on grammar as a liberating force would favour a process rather than a product approach to teaching grammar (Batstone 1994; Thornbury 2001), whereby learners are not compelled to use a particular D&G jewelry(http://www.dolcegabbana4sale.com) grammatical structure which has been preselected for them—it would be difficult to conceive of grammar being genuinely a liberating force if they were—but rather they choose from their stock of grammatical knowledge to express the meanings they wish to convey.

2. Lexis to grammar
If grammar liberates the language user by enabling him/her to transcend the limitations of telegraphic speech (using lexical items alone), there should be a progression from lexis to grammar both in the way language and materials are presented to learners, and in the language we expect them to produce. A grammar production task would typically require the learners to apply grammar to samples of language in which the grammar has been reduced or simplified, as typically found in notes of a meeting or a newspaper headline, where the meaning content is conveyed primarily through lexical items. Such tasks, where the learners are in effect asked to map grammar on to lexis, involve a process known variously as grammaticization (Batstone 1994) or 'grammaring' (Thornbury 2001). By engaging in this kind of activity, learners experience the process of using their grammatical resources to develop the meaning potential contained in the lexical items and express a range of meanings which the words alone could not convey. Such a process is not dissimilar to the processes involved in first language acquisition whereby the child moves from communication through telegraphic utterances involving strings of lexical items to the gradual deployment of morphemes and function words. It is not, however, a process promoted in traditional approaches to grammar teaching such as the presentation-practice-production format, where the learners are typically asked to move in the opposite direction—they begin with a preselected grammatical structure, and then have to slot lexis into it.

3. Comparing texts and noticing gaps
The third element in teaching grammar as a liberating force derives from well-established principles of task-based pedagogy (for example, Willis 1996; Skehan op. cit.) and relates to the importance of allowing the learners to focus on grammatical forms which arise from their communicative needs, and in particular as a result of noticing gaps in their own use of Cartier Jewelry(http://www.salecartier.com) grammar. These gaps are noticed through a process of comparing their output on a language production task with that of other learners or more proficient users, for example, a sample text, or a written transcript of native speakers doing the same task (Willis op. cit.). The focus on grammar is thus 'reactive' rather than proactive (Doughty and Williams 1998), because it arises from the specific communicative needs which the learners discover in the processes of doing the task, reviewing their performance and comparing it with others. In this way learners experience the liberating potential of grammar, not just to help them express their meanings in a particular activity with greater precision, but over time, through a sustained programme of comparing and noticing 'gaps' and differences, to enable them to develop their proficiency and sensitivity in the target language to increasingly more advanced levels.



Author Resource:- Our dolce gabbana jewelry are so fashion that you look more beautiful if you wear them.
Article From Talkinmince Article Directory

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
Rate This Article
Vote to see the results!

Do you like this article?
  • Yes.
  • Not Sure.
  • No.
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software

 



Powered By: Article Friendly sitemap